[statnet_help] TERGM model analysis problem valued edges

Federico Salvati via statnet_help statnet_help at u.washington.edu
Tue Jul 23 02:47:58 PDT 2024


Wow thank you everybody for your help and your swift responses. What an
amazing community


Federico

On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 at 23:38, Mark S. Handcock <handcock at ucla.edu> wrote:


> Hi Federico,

>

> The separable model uses the binary nature of the network in a fundamental

> way. If the edges have weights/values then a new separability assumption is

> needed, and this will generally not be as elegant as that for binary edges.

>

> This, however, has been done by Yik Lun Kei, a former student of mine:

>

> "A partially separable model for dynamic valued networks"

> (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167947323001226).

>

>

> and he has code on GitHub.

>

> Best,

>

> Mark

>

> ----------------------------------------------------

> Mark S. Handcock

> Distinguished Professor of Statistics

> Department of Statistics and Data Science

> University of California

> Los Angeles, CA 90095-1554.

> Web: https://faculty.stat.ucla.edu/handcock

> email: handcock at stat.ucla.edu

>

>

> On 7/20/24 1:52 PM, Martina Morris via statnet_help wrote:

>

> Hi Federico,

>

> I think some types of valued tie terms are possible in tergm. Tergms are

> implemented by specifying one or more ergms (how many depends on how many

> of the operators you're using (cross, change, form, diss/persist)). So the

> valued terms that are available in ergm may be used in this context.

>

> But Pavel is the expert on all things valued, so he should chime in here.

>

> best,

> Martina

>

> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:46 AM Federico Salvati via statnet_help <

> statnet_help at u.washington.edu> wrote:

>

>> Dear statnet team,

>>

>>

>> I am a PhD student in Berlin and I mostly do text mining but I am

>> approaching Network analysis for my project.

>>

>> I am having problems applying the TERGM model to my data. I have a

>> dynamic network dataset but I really would like to have a weighted value

>> for edges and not just a binary value.

>>

>> Can this be done with the package? I am not sure how to approach the

>> problem

>>

>>

>> Sorry if the question might be silly I am approaching SNA for the first

>> time and I am learning on my own so I am not quite proficient with it yet

>>

>> Best

>>

>> Federico Salvati

>> _______________________________________________

>> statnet_help mailing list

>> statnet_help at u.washington.edu

>> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/statnet_help

>>

>

> _______________________________________________

> statnet_help mailing liststatnet_help at u.washington.eduhttp://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/statnet_help

>

>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/statnet_help/attachments/20240723/82aa68ef/attachment.html>


More information about the statnet_help mailing list